Practice development needs a strong evidence base supporting it. Evidence can come from:
- research
- standards and guidelines
- policies
- professional opinion
- patient views.
Key questions
- What evidence or guidance is available on the subject?
- What is the quality of the evidence?
- What policy, protocols or pathways exist that inform this issue?
- What are the views of practitioners?
- What is the evidence from patients, carers and families locally?
- What new knowledge can be generated from this work?
- What gaps in evidence have been identified?
Consider
- Healthcare Improvement Scotland SIGN guidelines, standards, best practice statements, clinical outcome indicator reports
- Reviews of published literatur
- eAudit reports – local and national
- Observations of care and other activity dat‘rey’ literature – policy documents and other relevant reports; unpublished research findings
- Information from action research
- Information from patients’ experience
- Values of healthcare team
- Patient and carer views and values
- Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) – access to online tools and resources to support evidence-based practice
Organisational support
- NHS boards should consider supporting evidence by providing:
- Staff access to library and information support
- Clear systems for sharing new evidence based standards.
- Critical appraisal support for research evidence.
- Links between improvement-based activities, local research and development strategies.
- A system for capturing and using patient experience to inform planning.
More on organisational support
Professor Rosemary Richardson is a specialist in dietetics and the chair of the Practice Development AHP Network.
In dietetics, practice development approaches have been an effective catalyst for change. Evidence has been central to the change process.
“Practitioners are learning how to use evidence. For example, using patient focus public involvement work in defined areas such as cancer and diabetes , combined with critical reviews of peer review publications and linked to ‘expert’ resources from previous projects”
April 2009